Indians are argumantative in Nature

Indians are arguemantative in nature

If there is any issue, Indians solve it by arguing it out. One set of ideas are right and other set of ideas are wrong. One has to win and other has to lose. First Indians will fight it out. It is in the Indian traditions. The concept of sharing of information is not there. The discussions based on sharing of knowledge, at he the end of the discussion, every body has more knowledge than at the beginning of the discussion. The problems with the arguments is, at the end of the discussion, all the people stick to their guns, no more knowledge is added and the rivelevery continues.
In India, if you want somebody to listen to you, or somebody wants to take your ideas, then you have to beat them on their own game. First disarm then. Better is to demolish them. Now impose your ideas or will. They will take it. Then only they treat you as a leader and commander.
I will give a list examples, whenever there is protest in India, a democratic rights, what the state governments will do ?. First shoot the people on chest and head. The same state government will the compensation to the victim families, then set up a enquiery commission and then the negotiation. Always the result is in favour of the strongest one. In 2007, west Bengal, farm land were taken by the state government and give it to Tata Small car project “nano”. There was an agitation. The police opened fire killing several people. Compensation was paid and then to talk. In Rajesthan. May 2008, Gujjar were on foot to classify them as Scheduled Cast. The police opened fire, killing several people. Compensations were paid and then to the discussion table. Even in June 2008, in Karnataka, what the farmers are on road demanding more seeds and fertilizers, police first open and kill somebody and pay compensation.
What the hell this means to Indians attitude ?. who is right ?. who has more power?. Cant we Indians keep our heads cool and pool the best brains and ideas to solve the issue smoothly. Simply it is not in our blood.
In the business implications, If any foreigners wants to do business in India, It is better come alone as 100 % subsidary. All the 100% foreign owned companies are well, then the companies with their Indian partners. If you want an Indian partner, first disarm him, better be a silent business partner.
The Japanese way of business will not work in Indian. Building relationship for building the business is the Japanese way. Building business on relationship is the Indian way. Japanese trust on words and face. Indians don’t trust on words, especially on money matters. On trust don’t give money to any Indians. One must have some special skills to collect it back. It is better every thing should be taken it writing. Americans should be happy to get the things to be written on papper.
Remember, India is a “High context” society. Even the written things has to be interpreted the way it has to be. You need a special skill in interpretation and arguments in India. Enforcing a written agreement is also a difficult in India. Indian judiciary is very slow. To get justices the process is difficult. The time you spent on getting justice, you can do hundred better things. Indian Judiciary clearly say, “Thousand criminals can escape, but one innocent will not be punished”.

Now it time for arguments and interpretations, I think, the Indian judiciary is in favour of criminals……………any other arguments….